Casino Withdrawal Options Review Criteria

Our team evaluates each casino based on seven key criteria, resulting in a final rating that categorises the brand into one of three overall rating levels. Casino Withdrawal Options is one of them. Scroll down to learn how we review casinos’ cash-out transactions and what points brands can get from Gamblizard.

Our Overall Rating

Rating 4–5 This category signifies varied casino withdrawal methods with excellent adherence to industry security standards and same-day transactions.

Rating 2–3 The casino’s withdrawal range includes the most popular options. The transaction speed is standard in the industry, lasting no more than a couple of days.

Rating 1 These casinos rate lower since they have fewer possibilities for flexible cashouts and the waiting times are generally higher.

We attribute the ratings above to Withdrawal Options adopted by the reviewed casino, having evaluated 5 pivotal factors. Each is defined by a range of percentages with a total weight of 100%. The weight of these factors is not tantamount, though – the consideration we put into each influences the overall impression, with the Range of Methods being valued higher and Disclosure Transparency being valued lower.

You may consult them and the bearing they have on the final rating in the chart below:

[Isometric chart]

The final rating is calculated by the sum of criteria significance in per cent (S) multiplied by the respective criterion rating for each category scored from 1 to 5 in whole numbers (CR). The arithmetic formula for the final assessment is, thus, as follows:

Σ (S × CR) = Final Rating

Ex: For withdrawal methods of an X casino with the next entry data:

the final rating calculation will be this:

(25% × 5) + (25% × 4) + (20% × 4) + (20% × 3) + (10% × 1) = 1.25 + 1 + 0.8 + 0.6 + 0.1 = Rating 3.75

We invite you to consult our breakdown of all the compounding criteria for evaluating the casinos’ Withdrawal Options below.

Range of Methods

This criterion weighs 25% in the overall Casino Withdrawal Options rating.

5 points: The casino allows cashing out both to popular and niche debit cards and e-wallets (Visa (Electron, Debit)/MasterCard, Maestro, Solo, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, Paysafecard, etc.). It also authorises withdrawals to local and international bank accounts in addition to other means, including less widespread cashout options. Payments can be made to the used deposit means and to other options of the user’s choice. The casino doesn’t charge fees for withdrawals;

4 points: The casino allows cashing out both to popular and niche debit cards and e-wallets (Visa (Electron, Debit)/MasterCard, Maestro, Solo, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, Paysafecard, etc.). It also authorises withdrawals to national bank accounts. Payments can be made to the used deposit means or to the user’s bank account. The casino doesn’t charge fees for withdrawals;

3 points: The casino allows cashing out only to the most widespread national debit cards and bank accounts. Fees for withdrawals are not charged;

2 points: The casino allows cashing out only to the most widespread national debit cards and bank accounts. Small fees are charged for withdrawals;

1 point: The casino allows cashing out only to the most widespread national debit cards and bank accounts. Funds are transferred with a medium-sized fee.

Quantity of Methods

This criterion weighs 25% in the overall Casino Withdrawal Options rating.

5 points: 10+ withdrawal methods in total are available on the casino’s website (the more methods there are, the bigger the rate);

4 points: 7+ withdrawal methods in total are available on the casino’s website (the more methods there are, the bigger the rate);

3 points: 5–6 withdrawal methods are available on the casino’s website (the more methods there are, the bigger the rate);

2 points: 4 withdrawal methods are available on the casino’s website (the more methods there are, the bigger the rate);

1 point: ≲3 withdrawal methods are available on the casino’s website (the more methods there are, the bigger the rate).

Identity Verification Flow (“Know Your Customer”, KYC)

This criterion weighs 20% in the overall Casino Withdrawal Options rating.

5 points: TheKYC procedure is envisaged for fund withdrawals. Document submission is required only for one or several withdrawals to confirm player identity. The process is completed in less than 4 hours;

4 points: The KYC procedure is envisaged for fund withdrawals. Document submission is required for multiple withdrawals to confirm player identity. The process is completed within 24 hours;

3 points: The KYC procedure is envisaged for fund withdrawals. Document submission is required for multiple withdrawals to confirm player identity. The process is completed within 24–48 hours;

2 points: The KYC procedure is envisaged for fund withdrawals. Document submission is required for multiple withdrawals to confirm player identity. The process is completed in over 72 hours;

1 point: The KYC procedure is envisaged for fund withdrawals. The process is completed only after a request submitted to the casino’s Customer Support team.

Processing Speed Compliance

This criterion weighs 20% in the overall Casino Withdrawal Options rating.

5 points: Instant processing or crediting within a couple of hours, round the clock;

4 points: Processing within 24 hours, round the clock;

3 points: Processing takes more than24–48 hours;

2 points: Processing takes 48–72 hours;

1 point: Processing takes around a week.

Disclosure Transparency

This criterion weighs 10% in the overall Casino Withdrawal Options rating.

5 points: Withdrawal methods can be located easily on the casino’s website: they are presented on a separate page, accessible from a side navigation bar, bottom menu, or a quick search in the respective search bar. All the information is displayed in a clear and transparent manner. Withdrawal limits and fees are set forth exhaustively;

4 points: Withdrawal methods can be located easily on the casino’s website: they are presented under the general terms and conditions or FAQs and accessible after a quick search in the respective search bar. All the information is displayed in a clear and transparent manner. Withdrawal limits and fees are set forth exhaustively;

3 points: Withdrawal methods are present, but some searching is required in the general website terms and conditions. The information about withdrawal methods, limits, and fees is present but poorly detailed;

2 points: Withdrawal methods can be found after thoroughly searching the general website terms and conditions. The information about withdrawal methods, limits, and fees is present but incomplete;

1 point: Withdrawal methods can be found after thoroughly searching the general website terms and conditions. Withdrawal methods are listed confusingly. The information about withdrawal limits and fees is unavailable.